Quantcast
Channel: Syria
Viewing all 4970 articles
Browse latest View live

Putin is getting ready to pull out of Syria after securing political future for Assad

$
0
0

Putin and Assad

  • Russia is getting ready to pull its military out of Syria after two blood years in the conflict.
  • Russia is trying to bring together all sides of the Syrian conflict to reach a political solution to the fighting that started in 2011.
  • Russia backs Syria's Assad, who violently shut down pro-Democracy protests in 2011 and stands accused of war crimes with Russian assistance.

MOSCOW (AP) — Syrian President Bashar Assad was asked to come to Russia to get him to agree to potential peace initiatives drafted by Russia, Iran and Turkey as Russia prepares to scale down its military presence in the country’s 6-year war, the Kremlin said on Tuesday.

President Vladimir Putin hosted Assad in the Black Sea resort of Sochi on Monday ahead of a summit between Russia, Turkey and Iran and a new round of Syria peace talks in Geneva. The meeting was unannounced and the Kremlin did not make it public until Tuesday morning.

“I passed to (Putin) and all Russian people our greetings and gratitude for all of the efforts that Russia made to save our country,” Assad told Russia’s top brass.

Assad has only ventured outside his war-ravaged nation twice since the conflict began — both times to Russia. This week’s visit to meet Putin is his second since the crisis began in March 2011 leading to a civil war that has killed some 400,000 and resulted in millions of refugees.

The first was in October 2015, shortly after Russia launched its military campaign in Syria to shore up Assad’s forces which turned the war in favor of Assad.

The meeting in Sochi, which lasted three hours, came ahead of a summit at the same place between the presidents of Iran, Russia and Turkey. Iran and Russia have been Assad’s main backers while Turkey supports the opposition.

Putin had spoken with the leaders of Iran and Turkey to “assure them that Russia will work with Syrian leadership to prepare the groundwork for possible understandings” that could reached on Wednesday to “make sure” that agreements reached will be “viable,” Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s spokesman, told reporters on Tuesday.

Putin Trump

The Kremlin said Putin would phone President Donald Trump and Saudi King Salman to discuss the situation in Syria on Wednesday.

Asked whether Putin and Assad have talked about the Syrian president’s future in post-war Syria, Peskov said “possible options for political settlement have been discussed.” Faced with pressure from other nations urging Assad to step down, Moscow has insisted that it is up to the Syrian people to vote Assad in or out.

With the Syrian government controlling most of the country and Islamic State fighters in disarray, Putin told Assad at the Monday meeting that Moscow is about to curtail its military presence there.

“Regarding our joint operation to fight terrorists in Syria, this military operation is indeed coming to an end,” he told Assad in televised remarks. “I’m pleased to see your willingness to work with everyone who wants peace and settlement.”

The Kremlin has announced scale-downs and a halt in its operation in Syria before but did not follow through. Putin in March 2016 ordered that a withdrawal from Syria, saying “all the tasks have been accomplished.” In January, Russia said it is pulling out its aircraft carrier and other warships from the waters off Syria. Russia continued to operate warships off the Syrian shore as late as this fall.

Footage and photographs released by the Kremlin press office showed Putin giving Assad a warm embrace upon his arrival at Putin’s residence in Sochi.

Russian television showed footage of Putin and Assad entering a meeting with the top brass of Russia’s defense ministry and the General Staff.

“I asked the Syrian president to stop by,” Putin told the Russian generals. He then referred to Assad and said: “I would like to introduce you to people who played a key role in saving Syria.”

Assad’s office quoted him as thanking Russia and its military, which he said “gave martyrs and made efforts in Syria.” He added: “I was very happy to know that you are here since you are the officers who directly took part in the battle in Syria.”

Assad said the Russian Air Force helped Syrian troops in the fight against insurgents, helping many Syrians to return to their homes. “In the name of the Syrian people, I greet you and thank you all, every Russian officer, fighter and pilot that took part in this war.”

The meeting came two days after Syrian troops and their allies captured the eastern town of Boukamal, the last major inhabited area held by the IS group in Syria. Syrian troops and their Iran-backed allies marched into the town under the cover of Russian airstrikes.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This animation shows how terrifyingly powerful nuclear weapons have become


The US says 4 countries sponsor terrorism — here's why they're on the list

$
0
0

north korea

TOKYO (AP) — North Korea is on its way back onto a very short list of countries the United States says sponsor terrorism.

The designation, announced by President Donald Trump on Monday, will expand the already substantial array of sanctions the US has imposed on trade with North Korea. It will clamp down further on the North's access to banks and other financial institutions and, more importantly, deepen the stigma any potential trading partners will have to take into account before doing business with Pyongyang.

Even though many of the punishments against North Korea have already been enacted under previous sanctions measures, putting any country on the list is a very serious move by Washington. There are only three other countries on the list: Sudan, Iran and Syria. Cuba, which had been on the list from 1982, was removed by then-President Barack Obama in 2015.

But how exactly does the terrorism charge fit North Korea? And how does North Korea compare to the other countries on the list?

Here's a look, country by country:

SEE ALSO: This map shows how terrorism is impacting countries around the world

North Korea

In the 1980s, North Korea was particularly active in deadly acts of terrorism, including a bombing in Myanmar that killed South Korean Cabinet members and the downing of a South Korean commercial airliner. It was blacklisted in 1988, but delisted in 2008 as Washington tried to entice it into a nuclear deal.

The most glaring recent case of what could be seen as terrorism backed by North Korea is the assassination of leader Kim Jong Un's estranged half brother last February at the international airport in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Two young Southeast Asian women are now on trial for allegedly carrying out the killing, but authorities believe the plot was masterminded by North Korean agents who recruited, trained and supplied the women with the extremely toxic VX poison used in the assassination.

VX is a sophisticated nerve agent that is almost exclusively produced with state backing for military use. Moreover, the US has accused the North of involvement in several highly disruptive cyber incidents that could fall into the terrorism rubric.



Syria

Syria has been on the blacklist since the designation was created in 1979. According to the US, Bashar Assad's regime supports a variety of terrorist groups that have a destabilizing effect well beyond the region. In particular, according to the US, it provides political and weapons support to Lebanon-based Hezbollah, while helping Iran to keep the group armed.

The US claim against Syria also includes concerns about weapons of mass destruction — according to the State Department, it has used chemical weapons repeatedly against its own people.



Iran

Iran's listing goes back to 1984. A State Department report in July called Iran the world's foremost sponsor of terrorism and said it has supported Shia militias in Iraq and attempted to smuggle weapons to Palestinian terrorist groups in Gaza.

The WMD issue, also a factor with North Korea and Syria, has been cited by the State Department regarding Iran because of the proliferation threat posed by its nuclear program.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

ISIS has been militarily defeated in Iraq and Syria

$
0
0

isis militants islamic state

  • The leaders of Iraq and Iran both declared the terrorist group ISIS defeated militarily in Iraq and Syria.
  • Iraqis and Syrians, with assistance from the US and other regional militias, took their countries back from the terror group that declared its sovereign territory in the summer of 2014.
  • ISIS still has territory in countries around the world but has been brutally disrupted by a US-backed bombing campaign and advancing ground forces.


Iraqi Prime Minister Hadir Al-Abadi declared military victory over the Islamic State in Iraq on Tuesday, just hours after Iranian President Hassan Rouhani announced that Iranian-backed forces had driven the terror group out of Syria.

ISIS's last Iraqi town of Rawa fell on Friday, and Abadi only awaits the clearing of a patch of desert along Iraq's border with Syria to declare final victory. Iran posted pictures of one its most famous military leaders in a Syrian border town, indicating Iranian-backed forces had driven the terror group out of the country.

Combine, the two statements from the two leaders amount to long-awaited news: ISIS's territory in Iraq and Syria is gone; the terror group has been defeated.

Iraqi, Kurdish, Syrian, Iranian, Afghani, Lebanese, and scores of other fighters gave their lives over more than three years since ISIS declared its caliphate, or sovereign territory, to be ruled under a brutal interpretation of Islam in the summer of 2014.

ISIS territory

The rise and fall of ISIS

Initially, ISIS swept up large swaths of Iraq and neighboring Syria with a surprising military prowess and a potent brand of Sunni extremism, but on Tuesday those nations officially reclaimed their territory.

The US and 67 other nations from around the world formed a coalition to train, equip, and provide air support for the regional forces that confronted ISIS, mostly in Iraq. The US also supported Syrian forces fighting to defeat ISIS. Russia stepped in in late 2015 to provide air support for the Syrian government and allied Iranian militias, mainly backing the regime of President Bashar al-Assad against rebels threatening his rule, but also targeting some ISIS territory.

At its height, ISIS launched international terror attacks in Paris, London, Brussels, and across Asia. But its capability for carrying out such attacks has been hamstrung by the relentless assault on its home territory.

"If we can keep them declining and moving they have less time to sit and prepare," for attacks, Elaine Duke, the acting secretary of Homeland Security, said of terror groups in London last month.

In the span of just three years, ISIS went from attracting thousands of foreign fighters to its anti-Western cause and plotting devastating terror attacks all over the world, to surrendering en masse in their own territory.

Paris attacks

Threat from ISIS remains

But ISIS still controls territory in as many as a dozen other nations, as Libya, Afghanistan, the Philippines, and much of Africa battle their own ISIS cells or ISIS-linked terror groups. 

The threat of ISIS remains far from over. Beside the many ISIS cells around the world — as well as ISIS' continued online presence — fighters from the terror group spread around the region and have threatened to return.

In the late days of the US-backed assault on Raqqa, ISIS' Syrian capital, forces partnered with the US allowed thousands of ISIS fighters to flee the city with weapons and ammunition. The fighters, many of them foreign-born, swore to smuggle themselves across borders and commit terror attacks around the world. 

Meanwhile, neither Iraq or Syria can count themselves as whole even with the territory reclaimed. In Iraq, the Kurdish minority in the country's northeast voted to break away from Iraq. In Syria, the six-year long civil war continues with only a shaky vision of an end in sight.

Additionally, the preoccupation of the Syrian military with fighting its civil war in the western part of the country left a vacuum for Iranian forces to move in and fight ISIS in the east. It's likely an ISIS-free Syria will feature more Iranian influence, which will unsettle Tehran's regional rivals in Israel and Saudi Arabia.

SEE ALSO: Syrian opposition leader abruptly quits ahead of new round of UN peace talks

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch this F-15E Strike Eagle receive a special paint job in this incredible time-lapse

This photo says it all about Russia's involvement in Syria

$
0
0

putin and assad

  • Syrian President Bashar al-Assad made an unannounced visit to Russia to meet with Vladimir Putin.
  • The two presidents discussed bringing the Syrian Civil War to an end ahead of peace talks in Geneva.
  • Assad praised Putin, thanking and hugging him for his support.


Syrian President Bashar al-Assad visited Russia on Monday to discuss a political settlement aimed at bringing a peaceful end to his country's civil war, which is in its seventh year.

Assad met with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of peace talks in Geneva, where the two will engage in negotiations with Iran and Turkey, two of the conflict's warring factions. The goal is to get Assad to agree on a peaceful way forward. During their meeting, Assad praised Putin, hugging and thanking him for his support.

"I passed to [Putin] and all Russian people our greetings and gratitude for all of the efforts that Russia made to save our country," Assad said.

Russia became directly involved militarily in Syria in late 2015, propping up the Assad regime and turning the tide in Assad's favor. With Russia's support, the Syrian government has regained much of its grip of control over the country. Putin said that Russia would further scale down its military involvement now that the government has more control and the Islamic State group has lost most of its territory in the country.

"Regarding our joint operation to fight terrorists in Syria, this military operation is indeed coming to an end," he told Assad. "I’m pleased to see your willingness to work with everyone who wants peace and settlement."

Also on Tuesday, US President Donald Trump spoke with Putin over the phone for nearly an hour to discuss the Syrian talks, among other issues. Trump has defended his friendly relationship with Putin, which he says is necessary to make progress in the fight against terrorism. But he has diverged with Putin in Syria, most notably when he authorized a missile strike on a government-controlled airfield in April in response to a chemical attack.

Close to 500,000 people have been killed in the conflict and millions more have fled as refugees.

SEE ALSO: Putin is getting ready to pull out of Syria after securing political future for Assad

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A North Korean defector tells us what life was like under a dictatorship

Russia plans to significantly reduce its troops in Syria by the end of 2017

$
0
0

A Russian warplane takes off at Hmeymim air base in Syria

  • Russia's military, mainly its air force, has been bombing in Syria in support of Bashar Assad's government since late 2015.
  • Russia has been trying to round up the heads of all political and military sides for peace talks in Syria lately.
  • Russia plans to significantly reduce its troop levels in Syria by the year's end.

SOCHI, Russia (Reuters) - The size of Russia's military force in Syria is likely to be significantly reduced and a drawdown could start before the end of the year, the chief of the Russian military general staff said on Thursday.

Russia's military support of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, notably through air strikes, has been crucial in defeating Islamic State and Syrian opposition forces.

"There is very little left to do before the completion of military objectives. Of course, a decision will be made by the supreme commander-in-chief and the deployment will be reduced," Valery Gerasimov told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and military top brass in the Black Sea resort of Sochi.

Gerasimov said forces would likely be "substantially" reduced but leave Russia with two military bases, a ceasefire-monitoring center and "a number of necessary structures to support the situation which has developed" in Syria.

Putin hosted Assad in Sochi on Monday and discussed moving from military operations to a search for a political solution to Syria's conflict. [nL8N1NR0K3]

On Wednesday, Putin won the backing of Turkey and Iran to host a Syrian peace conference, taking the central role in a major diplomatic push to finally end Syria's civil war, now in its seventh year. [nL8N1NS5RQ]

In March last year Putin said Russia had achieved its goals in Syria and ordered the withdrawal of the "main part" of its forces. However, a U.S.-led coalition operating in Syria said that after that statement Russia's combat power was largely intact.

SEE ALSO: ISIS has been militarily defeated in Iraq and Syria

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This animation shows how terrifyingly powerful nuclear weapons have become

Bombshell report reveals new details about Trump's Oval Office meeting with Russians after he fired Comey

$
0
0

donald trump kislyak

  • President Donald Trump infuriated the US and Israeli intelligence communities when he disclosed details of a highly classified Israeli operation to Russian officials earlier this year.
  • Vanity Fair reported on Thursday that a top US official told the Israelis in January that Russia had "leverages of pressure" over Trump.


President Donald Trump sparked widespread concern within the US and Israeli intelligence communities earlier this year when he disclosed details of a highly classified Israeli operation to Russian officials, according to a new Vanity Fair report.

The Washington Post first reported in May that Trump told Russia's foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, and ambassador to the US at the time, Sergey Kislyak, about the terrorist group ISIS's work to develop a laptop bomb that could pass through airport security undetected — information Trump had received from Israeli intelligence officials.

The information was highly classified and had not been disclosed even to close American allies.

Vanity Fair reported on Wednesday that a top American spy told Israeli intelligence officials during a meeting at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, a few weeks before Trump's inauguration that US intelligence believed Russian President Vladimir Putin had "leverages of pressure" over Trump.

The report said that American official warned that information provided to the White House could be leaked to the Russians and, therefore, eventually to their ally Iran, Israel's greatest adversary.

But the Israelis reportedly did not treat this warning with much seriousness and continued sharing highly classified information with the US, one of its closest allies.

Trump met with Lavrov and Kislyak in the Oval Office on May 10, the day after he fired James Comey as FBI director. Trump told the Russians that he had "faced great pressure" as a result of the investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 US election — and whether the Trump campaign colluded with Moscow — that Comey was leading, calling him "crazy" and "a real nut job."

Trump then reportedly described the broad outlines of the Israeli intelligence and named the Syrian city in which it was gathered.

'A hell of price to pay for a president's mistake'

When this surfaced in news reports, Israeli and US intelligence officials were infuriated, Vanity Fair reported.

"Trump betrayed us," a senior Israeli military official told the news outlet. "And if we can't trust him, then we're going to have to do what is necessary on our own if our back is up against the wall with Iran."

Michael Morell, a former CIA deputy director, told CBS News in May that Trump's apparently unvetted disclosure was "highly damaging" and would negatively affect the US's relationships with foreign allies.

"Third countries who provide the United States with intelligence information will now have pause," Morell said.

Morrell predicted that the Russians would attempt to determine how the Israelis collected the intelligence and could target its source, which Vanity Fair reported was embedded deep within ISIS territory in Syria.

"The Russians will undoubtedly try to figure out the source or the method of this information to make sure that it is not also collecting on their activities in Syria — and in trying to do that they could well disrupt the source," Morell said.

One former Israeli official would not disclose what happened to the source but told Vanity Fair, "Whatever happened to him, it's a hell of price to pay for a president's mistake."

SEE ALSO: Trump to Russian diplomats: Firing 'nut job' James Comey took 'great pressure' off me

SEE ALSO: Trump reportedly revealed highly classified information to the Russians last week that the US hasn't even 'shared with our own allies'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Vladimir Putin could secretly be one of the richest men in the world — an investigative reporter who spent 4 years in Russia explains

The caliphate may be destroyed, but ISIS isn't defeated

$
0
0

Members of the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF) gesture on the outskirt of Bartila east of Mosul during an operation to attack Islamic State militants in Mosul, Iraq, October 19, 2016. REUTERS/Azad Lashkari

  • ISIS no longer controls any major population center in Iraq or Syria.
  • While the much-dreamed-about caliphate may be dead, the resilient and adaptive group almost certainly will not go quietly into the night.
  • Rather, it will work doggedly in the coming months to keep its brand alive, likely through a combination of actions.


The fall of the town of Abu Kamal in Syria and recent victories by Iraqi security forces in Qaim and Rawa in Iraq mark the collapse of the Islamic State caliphate. With the loss of these towns located along the Iraq-Syria border, the terrorist group no longer controls any major population center in either country.

This represents quite a reversal for the Islamic State from its heady days of only three years ago, when it controlled vast swaths of territory, routinely extorted taxes from local businesses, exploited the region’s natural resources (especially oil), and governed a large percentage of the population of both countries. Those days are thankfully done — at least for now — and that’s a development worth celebrating.

But is this a lasting setback for the Islamic State, or is there another chapter to its story? Unfortunately, as the Islamic State has demonstrated in the past, it’s a resilient and adaptive enemy that almost certainly will not go quietly into the night. Rather, it will work doggedly in the coming months to keep its brand alive, likely through a combination of actions.

First, many battle-hardened veterans will try to retreat into remote regions of western Iraq and eastern Syria, waiting patiently to determine whether both governments are serious about holding and rebuilding newly liberated areas.

And while they wait, these fighters are likely to periodically attack government forces and urban centers, sending a not-too-subtle reminder to local populations that the Islamic State is still operationally viable.

Second, the Islamic State still retains some control over eight global branches and networks, and the group will likely make every effort to deepen operational connectivity across its global enterprise.

At the moment, it seems especially interested in reconstituting a presence in central and southern Libya, and in expanding activities in Southeast Asia. Many Islamic State fighters are also likely to return to their countries of origin, with at least some determined to carry on the fight from there.

And finally, the Islamic State will try to adjust its public narrative, using every available platform to reinforce its core messages: that the fight goes on despite the end of its caliphate, and that sympathizers should launch lone-wolf attacks in the West — similar to the one conducted at the end of last month in lower Manhattan.

So, that’s their plan. And what should we do in response?

To counter the Islamic State playbook, U.S. policymakers will need to act against both the near-and long-term challenges the group presents.

trumpIn the near term, there are several policies worth considering, including increasing support for reconstruction efforts in Iraq and parts of eastern Syria, particularly through measures aimed at empowering local Sunni populations and assuaging their fears of Shiite political power; learning everything we can from the alleged perpetrator of the New York City attack about his radicalization process and then devising tailored countermeasures; and deepening information sharing between our intelligence, law enforcement, and domestic police forces, while expanding cooperation with partner nations as they begin to deal with the imminent return of highly skilled foreign fighters.

However, having worked on counterterrorism issues in senior government positions for the past several years, I’m also convinced that these types of short-term responses are insufficient if we hope to undermine the Islamic State’s long-term prospects.

To achieve that goal, U.S. and Western policymakers will have to begin chipping away at the underlying conditions that have fueled the Islamic State’s growth. Fortunately, one opportunity may be presenting itself in Saudi Arabia, where Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has embarked on an ambitious reform agenda to remake Saudi society and, most importantly, to promote a more moderate version of Saudi Islam.

A genuine reform effort in the kingdom — and it’s still too early to know whether this is real or cosmetic — coupled with a concrete commitment to no longer export the Saudi brand of puritanical Wahhabi Sunni Islam abroad would be a significant help in preventing radicalization globally and in shrinking the Islamic State’s pool of potential recruits. The stated goal of the Saudi reform initiative is unprecedented, and it’s a project worthy of Washington’s close scrutiny and, if warranted, encouragement.

Similarly, to undermine a key aspect of the Islamic State’s historical appeal to Sunnis, U.S. and Western policymakers might usefully explore ways to strengthen Iran’s moderates, even in the face of the bitter debate about the fate of the nuclear agreement.

While Washington clearly needs to push back on Iran’s malign activities in the region, President Hassan Rouhani’s reformist mandate (he was re-elected by a landslide last May) offers the best hope for undercutting hard-line elements inside the country, especially the Revolutionary Guards and Quds Force — the units responsible for Iran’s aggressive military operations throughout the Middle East. As a regional expert once told me, there are three categories of political actors in Iran: moderate, conservative, and evil. We need to subtly support the former even as we confront the latter.

Philippines ISISU.S. policies that inadvertently weaken Rouhani and strengthen Iran’s hard-liners fit neatly into the Islamic State’s recruiting pitch: that the caliphate represents a bulwark against a pan-Shiite, Iranian-led expansionary movement. That’s a message that’s tailor-made to appeal to isolated and disempowered Sunnis throughout the Middle East.  So, while confronting the Islamic State on the battlefield is necessary, empowering moderates throughout the Muslim world is critical.

And lastly, to further erode the Islamic State’s long-term influence, U.S. and Western diplomats should target their diplomatic efforts at resolving (or at least easing) conflicts in a few critical countries, particularly Libya and Yemen.

The Islamic State has exploited profound instability in these countries to expand its footprint, acquire key terrain, and conduct operations; thus progress there in reducing violence, improving humanitarian conditions, and strengthening central governance will inevitably help shrink the operating space.

The end of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s physical caliphate is a clear success of U.S. military, diplomatic, and intelligence efforts across the past two administrations. It reminds us what a carefully considered, integrated, and well-resourced strategy can accomplish in the span of only a few years; it’s also significant that the United States was able to accomplish this in close coordination with partners and resisted the urge to confront the Islamic State unilaterally.

But whether this success is short-lived or an actual turning point will be heavily influenced by the decisions we make in the next few months, and whether we commit to tackling immediate challenges as well as the deep-seated political, security, cultural, and ideological conditions that contributed to the Islamic State’s rise in the first place.

SEE ALSO: ISIS has been militarily defeated in Iraq and Syria

DON'T MISS: State Department: Obama 'tried' to defeat ISIS, but Trump succeeded

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why Korean parents are having their kids get plastic surgery before college

The Pentagon is likely to admit that there are 2,000 US troops in Syria

$
0
0

The Pentagon is shown in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., September 11, 2017.   REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon is likely to announce in the coming days that there are about 2,000 US troops in Syria, two US officials said on Friday, as the military acknowledges that an accounting system for troops has under-reported the size of forces on the ground.

The US military had earlier publicly said it had around 500 troops in Syria, mostly supporting the Syrian Democratic Forces group of Kurdish and Arab militias fighting Islamic State in the north of the country.

Two US officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the Pentagon could, as early as Monday, publicly announce that there are slightly more than 2,000 US troops in Syria. They said there was always a possibility that last minute changes in schedules could delay an announcement.

That is not an increase in troop numbers, just a more accurate count, as the numbers often fluctuate.

An accounting system, known as the Force Management Level (FML), was introduced in Iraq and Syria during former President Barack Obama’s administration as a way to exert control over the military.

But the numbers do not reflect the extent of the US commitment on the ground since commanders often found ways to work around the limits — sometimes bringing in forces temporarily or hiring more contractors.

The force management levels are officially at 5,262 in Iraq and 503 in Syria, but officials have privately acknowledged in the past that the real number for each country is more than the reported figure.

US soldiers Syria

The Pentagon said last December that it would increase the number of authorized troops in Syria to 500, but it is not clear how long the actual number has been at around 2,000.

Obama periodically raised FML limits to allow more troops in Iraq and Syria as the fight against Islamic State advanced.

As that campaign winds down, it is unclear how many, if any, US troops will remain in Syria.

Most of them are special operations forces, working to train and advise local partner forces, including providing artillery support against Islamic State militants.

One of the officials said that the actual number in Iraq is not expected to be announced because of "host nation sensitivities," referring to political sensitivities about US forces in Iraq.

In August, the Pentagon announced that there were 11,000 troops serving in Afghanistan, thousands more than it has previously stated.

US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has in the past expressed frustration with the FML method of counting US troops in conflict zones.

(Reporting by Idrees Ali; editing by Alistair Bell)

SEE ALSO: Artillery strikes against ISIS in Syria were so intense they burned out 2 Marine howitzers

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What the US needs to do to prevent a new ISIS in Iraq


US aircraft experiences 'violent turbulence' after Russian fighter jet turns on afterburners

$
0
0

Su-30

  • A Russian fighter jet reportedly made unsafe maneuvers near a US aircraft flying over the Black Sea.
  • The fighter jet flew in front of the US aircraft and turned on its afterburners.
  • The incident comes amid divisive rhetoric from Russia, in which it likened US service members operating in Syria to "occupying forces."


A Russian fighter jet reportedly made unsafe maneuvers near a US aircraft flying over the Black Sea, CNN reported Monday.

The Russian Su-30 jet reportedly crossed in front of the US P-8A Poseidon aircraft Saturday, flying as close as 50 feet, and turned on its afterburners, Lt. Col. Michelle Baldanza, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said to CNN.

The maneuver left "violent turbulence" in its wake, forcing the P-8A to deal with a 15-degree roll, according to Baldanza. The incident reportedly lasted 24 minutes.

"The US aircraft was operating in international airspace and did nothing to provoke this Russian behavior," Baldanza said in the report. "Unsafe actions‎ have the potential to cause serious harm and injury to all air crews involved."

In June, an armed Russian Su-27 fighter jet intercepted a US RC-135 reconnaissance plane over the Baltic Sea, coming as close as five feet. The two aircraft were operating in international airspace; however, a US Air Force spokesperson said at the time that "there are international standards to ensure safety and prevent incidents."

The latest incident comes amid Russia's accusations, made earlier this month, in which they called the US-led coalition force combating Islamic State militants in Syria "occupying forces." Russia, a key ally to Syria's embattled leader, President Bashar al-Assad, has been at odds with US forces and their allies during the Syrian civil war.

SEE ALSO: An armed Russian jet intercepted a US plane in an 'unsafe' manner over the Baltic Sea

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What the US needs to do to prevent a new ISIS in Iraq

There's confusion about US troop levels in the Middle East, and Trump may keep it that way

$
0
0

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Army soldiers from the 2nd Platoon, B battery 2-8 field artillery, fire a howitzer artillery piece at Seprwan Ghar forward fire base in Panjwai district, Kandahar province southern Afghanistan, June 12, 2011. REUTERS/Baz Ratner/File Photo

  • The Defense Department has released conflicting numbers about the number of US troops deployed overseas.
  • It has acknowledged the differences and promised to be more transparent about troop levels.
  • But comments by President Donald Trump and ongoing operations suggest that discrepancies will remain.


Recent data on troop levels in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria released by the Defense Department conflicts with official statements about the number of personnel in those countries, though officials have said there a number of reasons for those discrepancies.

According to the Defense Manpower Data Center, run by the Department of Defense, there were 25,910 US active-duty, national guard, or reserve military personnel in those three countries as of September 30. That is over 11,000 more than the 14,765 personnel that the Pentagon has said are deployed to the three countries.

The Defense Department has acknowledged that the DMDC numbers and official troop levels are often two different things, typically because troops on temporary assignments or on overlapping rotations, as well as some special-operations forces, have not been included in official Pentagon counts.

us soldiers mosul iraq

When previously asked about troop numbers, the Pentagon has given the Force Management Level, which is the cap set on troop levels by the Obama administration.

Based on that number, the Defense Department has said there were 5,262 US personnel in Iraq, according to Military Times. However, the DMDC's tally for Iraq in December 2016, the last report issued under Obama, was 6,812 troops in Iraq, while the latest report put the number of personnel there at 8,892.

The 1,720 US military personnel the latest DMDC report said were deployed to Syria was also significantly more than the 503 personnel the Pentagon said as recently as Monday were in the war-torn country, in accordance with the Force Management Level limit.

US troop deployments

The 15,298 personnel in Afghanistan at the end of the third quarter this year were more than the 14,000 troops the Pentagon said were there as recently as early November, after President Donald Trump authorized the deployment of 3,900 more US troops at the end of August.

The Force Management Level cap for Afghanistan is just over 8,400, but the US has maintained more personnel there for some time.

The DMDC's June report put the number of personnel in Afghanistan at nearly 12,000.

A Pentagon official told ABC News that DMDC data was "an initial estimate and starting point" that looks at permanently deployed personnel as well as those who could possibly be deployed, meaning the June count may have included troops in the US who were preparing to go to Afghanistan.

Discrepancies exist elsewhere in the DMDC's data, including for Niger, where the latest DMDC report says 536 troops are deployed, while the White House has said 645 are there and military officials have said 800.

'America's enemies must never know our plans or believe they can wait us out'

US military officials have downplayed the discrepancies between official numbers and those reported by the DMDC.

Eric Pahon, a Pentagon spokesman, told The Washington Post that DMDC data is "not meant to represent an accurate accounting of troops deployed to any particular region," though that may change as the Pentagon evaluates the value of the data it discloses on a quarterly basis.

"There are several other things that go into those numbers," Pentagon spokesman Army Col. Rob Manning told ABC News. "It is a snapshot in time and have to also consider that number is quarterly ... our official deployment count has not changed."

In addition to overlapping rotations that inflate the DMDC count, Manning told The Post, political sensitivities and agreements with host countries can also limit disclosures about troop levels. Security concerns also influence reports about troop levels in certain places, he added.

US Marines Anbar Iraq sandstorm

Todd Harrison, a defense analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told The Post that the Obama administration's desire to maintain a small military presence in Iraq and Syria led to discrepancies between the Force Management Level and the actual number of personnel deployed.

Harrison said the Trump administration was still dealing with earlier practices that didn't clearly state how many US troops were in a given place.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, who has expressed frustration with the Force Management Level system, has acknowledged the differing numbers and pledged to introduce more transparency at the Pentagon. Trump, however, has indicated that the US will continue to be less than forthcoming with actual troop levels.

trump afghanistan

"We will not talk about numbers of troops or our plans for further military activities," Trump said during an August speech announcing his new strategy for Afghanistan.

"Conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables, will guide our strategy from now on. America's enemies must never know our plans or believe they can wait us out."

While keeping some troop levels secret, like those of special-operations forces, serves a tactical purpose in some cases, a lack of clarity about actual troop levels can give a misleading picture of the military's commitments. This issue is especially salient for special-operations forces, who officials have warned are overstretched and taxed by a high operational tempo.

But Trump's comments appear to elide the differences between things like disclosing military plans and accountability to the public and to US military families.

"If disclosing the overall number of American service personnel who are sent to a war jeopardizes operational security, then that would be news to previous presidents who disclosed at the public podium how many Americans were fighting the country’s wars," Roll Call's senior defense writer John Donnelly said in August.

SEE ALSO: US Marines are returning to 'old stomping grounds' in Iraq to fight an evolving enemy

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map shows the countries where the most US troops are stationed

Russia is reportedly working on a deal to use Egypt's military bases

$
0
0

su 24 frogfoot syria

  • Russia and Egypt are reportedly working on a deal to use eachother's air space and air bases.
  • Egypt has struggled with an ISIS insurgency, and Russia is just coming off an air campaign to support Syria's President Bashar Assad.
  • Russia is also cozying up to Libyan commander Khalifa Haftar.

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's government published a draft agreement between Russia and Egypt on Thursday allowing both countries to use each other's air space and air bases for their military planes.

The draft deal was set out in a decree, signed by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev on Nov. 28, which ordered the Russian Defence Ministry to hold negotiations with Egyptian officials and to sign the document once both sides reached an agreement.

Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu visited Cairo for talks with Egypt's political and military leadership on Wednesday and the decree said the draft had been "preliminary worked through with the Egyptian side" and approved by Medvedev.

Russia launched a military operation to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in September 2015 and there are signs it is keen to further expand its military presence in the region.

U.S. officials said in March that Russia had deployed special forces in Egypt near the border with Libya, an allegation Moscow denied.

Russia has cultivated close ties with powerful Libyan commander Khalifa Haftar, who held talks with Shoigu, the Russian defence minister, via video link from a Russian aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean this year and visited Moscow.

Russian and Egyptian war planes would be able to use each other's air space and airfields by giving five days advance notice, according to the draft agreement, which is expected to be valid for five years and could be extended.

SEE ALSO: Images of North Korea's latest missile launch reveal a big problem for the US

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This animation shows how terrifyingly powerful nuclear weapons have become

The next phase in the Syrian peace process might determine whether the war-torn country actually becomes a democracy — here's why

$
0
0

Syrian soldier Aleppo

  • The UN envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura believes that because only Europe and the US can rebuilt post-war Syria, it must accept UN terms for peace negotiations.
  • The editorial board writes that Assad's dictatorship is inherently unstable, and thus democracy is the only viable way forward in the long-term.


One fallacy about the long war in Syria has been that it is simply a contest for military dominance – between groups of Syrians, between foreign powers such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, and between all of them and the terrorist group Islamic State. But with peace talks due to open Nov. 29, the United Nations envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, offers an alternative narrative.

He says “a moment of truth” has now arrived for the “real” contest, a political solution that could possibly play out next year in UN-supervised elections under a new Syrian constitution.

The reason such a view is credible lies in the fact that the war began in 2011 out of resistance to a similar “truth.” Liberated in their thinking by the Arab Spring, millions of Syrians rose up in peaceful protest to demand democracy. Since then, the anti-democratic forces, led by Russia, have largely prevailed on the battlefield. Now exhausted by war and unable to pay for the rebuilding of Syria, they have opened a door to a negotiated settlement leading to elections under UN supervision.

The foreign powers backing Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad must face a simple truth. Only the democratic countries in Europe as well as the United States can afford to rebuild Syria or revive its economy. For that reason and because of domestic pressure at home, Russian President Vladimir Putin went along with a Security Council demand for the Geneva talks to focus on a new constitution and elections.

Or as Mr. de Mistura put it, any peace process must enable “Syrians to determine their own future freely.”

Dictatorships like the Assad regime are inherently unstable because they rely on physical threats to stay in control rather than tolerating an open contest of political ideas in elections. The arc of history still bends toward democracy, or a respect for individual rights and equality before the law. Over time, those values can be as powerful as bullets.

These talks are the eighth attempt over many years to end a war that has claimed more than 400,000 lives. This time, however, the outside powers appear ready to force a deal on the Syrians. A total military victory seems out of reach.

The fallacy that power lies in guns has been exposed. This leaves Syrians on all sides at a “moment of truth,” or the need for an agreement that defines power by democratic means.

SEE ALSO: The Pentagon is likely to admit that there are 2,000 US troops in Syria

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why Korean parents are having their kids get plastic surgery before college

Syria says it shot down 3 missiles fired from Israel

$
0
0

israeli air force blue flag israel

  • Syria says it shot down three Israeli missiles targeting a military post days after Israel had hit another military post.
  • Israel has mostly stayed out of Syria's conflict, but it has attacked certain Iranian sites as Tehran's presence and influence grow in Syria.
  • Israel says it has been shooting down Syrian and Iranian drones that enter its airspace.

BEIRUT — Syrian air defense units shot down three Israeli missiles that were targeting a military post near the capital, Damascus, only days after the Jewish state hit a military position nearby, the Syrian state news agency SANA reported on Tuesday.

There was no Israeli comment on the incident.

SANA did not say whether some of the missiles hit the target and did not give any word on casualties. It said the attack occurred at about midnight on Monday.

The attack comes three days after Syria said Israel fired several surface-to-surface missiles at a military post near Damascus, causing material damage but no casualties.

"Our air defense units confronted an Israeli aggression with missiles on one of our military posts in the countryside of Damascus and shot down three of them" SANA said.

The opposition's Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the attack was an Israeli airstrike on the Damascus suburb of Jamraya, which is home to a government research center.

Some media reports have said Saturday's missile attack near the Damascus suburb of Kiswa targeted an Iranian military position. The Observatory said at the time that the area hit Saturday had Iranian and Hezbollah presence, but it added that it was not clear whether they were targeted.

Though Israel has mainly stayed out of the conflict in neighboring Syria, it has carried out airstrikes against suspected arms shipments believed to be bound for Lebanon's Hezbollah militant group, which is fighting alongside Syrian President Bashar Assad's government forces in the civil war, now in its seventh year.

Israel has also struck several Syrian military facilities since the conflict began, mostly near the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. In September, Israeli warplanes hit a military position near the Mediterranean coast in western Syria, killing two soldiers and causing material damage.

Last month, the Israeli military said it shot down a drone above the Golan Heights that tried to infiltrate its airspace from Syria, using a Patriot missile. It said the drone was operated by the Syrian government and was shot down in the demilitarized zone between the two countries. And in September, Israel said it shot down an Iranian-made drone sent by Hezbollah in the same area. Iran has also backed Assad in Syria's conflict.

Israel opposes a permanent military presence in Syria of the Iranians and Hezbollah, fearing possible attacks in the future, and has raised the matter in the past with Russia, another main backer of Assad.

SEE ALSO: US missile defenses fired 5 shots at an incoming target — and it looks as if they all missed

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How much money you need to save each day to become a millionaire by age 65

Pentagon admits there are about 2,000 US troops in Syria — 4 times as many as it previously said

$
0
0

US soldier Syria Raqqa

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon says there are about 2,000 US troops in Syria. That is four times as many as officials had publicly acknowledged as recently as last month.

The new total does not mean additional troops have been deploying to Syria. It's merely a long-delayed confirmation that the troop numbers the Pentagon had been citing were inaccurate.

In fact, the Pentagon spokesman who announced the new number, Army Col. Rob Manning, said Wednesday that troop numbers are now declining in Syria.

Manning also said there are about 5,200 US troops in Iraq. That number also is trending downward, he said, as the US-led coalition in both Iraq and Syria transition from supporting offensive combat operations against Islamic State fighters to supporting local security efforts to prevent a reemergence of IS.

SEE ALSO: There's confusion about US troop levels in the Middle East, and Trump may keep it that way

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What the US needs to do to prevent a new ISIS in Iraq

High-level defector says thousands of ISIS militants escaped Raqqa in secret US-approved deal

$
0
0

isis convoy bus

  • A former commander and spokesman for the Syrian Democratic Forces said the SDF arranged to bus all remaining ISIS fighters out of Raqqa in October.
  • The former commander originally told the media that fewer than 300 fighters left Raqqa with their families.
  • He now claims that the number of fighters who were allowed to go was far higher, and that the story of a last-ditch battle was a fiction designed to keep journalists away while the militants' evacuation took place.
  • He also alleged that a U.S. official approved the deal during a meeting with an SDF commander.
  • U.S. officials called his comments as "false and contrived."


ANKARA (Reuters) - A high-level defector from Kurdish-led forces that captured the Syrian city of Raqqa from Islamic State has recanted his account of the city's fall, saying thousands of IS fighters - many more than first reported - left under a secret, U.S.-approved deal.

Talal Silo, a former commander in the Syrian Democratic Forces, said the SDF arranged to bus all remaining Islamic State militants out of Raqqa even though it said at the time it was battling diehard foreign jihadists in the city.

U.S. officials described Silo's comments as "false and contrived" but a security official in Turkey, where Silo defected three weeks ago, gave a similar account of Islamic State's defeat in its Syrian stronghold. Turkey has been at odds with Washington over U.S. backing for the Kurdish forces who led the fight for Raqqa.

Silo was the SDF spokesman and one of the officials who told the media in mid-October - when the deal was reached - that fewer than 300 fighters left Raqqa with their families while others would fight on.

However, he told Reuters in an interview that the number of fighters who were allowed to go was far higher and the account of a last-ditch battle was a fiction designed to keep journalists away while the evacuation took place.

He said a U.S. official in the international coalition against Islamic State, whom he did not identify, approved the deal at a meeting with an SDF commander.

At the time there were conflicting accounts of whether or not foreign Islamic State fighters had been allowed to leave Raqqa. The BBC later reported that one of the drivers in the exodus described a convoy of up to 7 km (4 miles) long made up of 50 trucks, 13 buses and 100 Islamic State vehicles, packed with fighters and ammunition.

isis dabiq syria

The Turkish government has expressed concern that some fighters who left Raqqa could have been smuggled across the border into Turkey and could try to launch attacks there or in the West.

"Agreement was reached for the terrorists to leave, about 4,000 people, them and their families," Silo said, adding that all but about 500 were fighters.

He said they headed east to Islamic State-controlled areas around Deir al-Zor, where the Syrian army and forces supporting President Bashar al-Assad were gaining ground.

For three days the SDF banned people from going to Raqqa, saying fighting was in progress to deal with militants who had not given themselves up.

"It was all theater," Silo said.

"The announcement was cover for those who left for Deir al-Zor", he said, adding that the agreement was endorsed by the United States which wanted a swift end to the Raqqa battle so the SDF could move on towards Deir al-Zor.

US at odds with Turkey

It was not clear where the evacuees from Raqqa ended up.

The Syrian Democratic Forces deny that Islamic State fighters were able to leave Raqqa for Deir al-Zor, and the U.S.-led military coalition which backs the SDF said it "does not make deals with terrorists."

"The coalition utterly refutes any false accusations from any source that suggests the coalition's collusion with ISIS," it said in a statement.

However, a Turkish security official said that many more Islamic State personnel left Raqqa than was acknowledged. "Statements that the U.S. or the coalition were engaged in big conflicts in Raqqa are not true," the official added.

He told Reuters Turkey believed those accounts were aimed at diverting attention from the departure of Islamic State members, and complained that Turkey had been kept in the dark.

Kurdish fighters from the People's Protection Units (YPG) run across a street in Raqqa, Syria July 3, 2017. REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic

Ankara, a NATO ally of Washington's and a member of the U.S.-led coalition, has disagreed sharply with the United States over its support for the Syrian Kurdish YPG fighters who spearheaded the fight against Islamic State in Raqqa.

Turkey says the YPG is an extension of the PKK, which has waged a three-decade insurgency in southeast Turkey and is designated a terrorist group by the United States and European Union.

Silo spoke to Reuters in a secure location on the edge of Ankara in the presence of Turkish security officers. He said the security was for his own protection and he denied SDF assertions that he had been pressured into defecting by Turkey, where his children live.

A member of Syria's Turkmen minority, Silo said his decision to speak out now was based on disillusionment with the structure of the SDF, which was dominated by Kurdish YPG fighters at the expense of Arab, Turkmen and Assyrian allies, as well as the outcome in Raqqa, where he said a city had been destroyed but not the enemy.

The Raqqa talks took place between a Kurdish SDF commander, Sahin Cilo, and an intermediary from Islamic State whose brother-in-law was the Islamic State "emir" in Raqqa, Silo said.

After they reached agreement Cilo headed to a U.S. military base near the village of Jalabiya. "He came back with the agreement of the U.S. administration for those terrorists to head to Deir al-Zor," Silo said.

The coalition said two weeks ago that one of its leaders was present at the talks but not an active participant in the deal which it said was reached "despite explicit coalition disagreement with letting armed ISIS terrorists leave Raqqa."

(Reporting by Dominic Evans; editing by Giles Elgood)

SEE ALSO: Britain's Defence Secretary has threatened to kill every single extremist who has left the UK to fight for ISIS

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 6 airline industry secrets that will help you fly like a pro


An undercover blogger lived a double life for 2 years in ISIS-occupied Iraq to document the group's atrocities — here's his story

$
0
0

omar mohammed

  • A historian spent years living under Islamic State rule in Mosul, Iraq, documenting the group's crimes and blogging about them to thousands of followers online.
  • Now that the Islamic State hopes for a caliphate in Iraq and Syria are virtually dead, the historian feels compelled to reveal his identity.


The historian carried secrets too heavy for one man to bear.

He packed his bag with his most treasured possessions before going to bed: the 1 terabyte hard drive with his evidence against the Islamic State group, an orange notebook half-filled with notes on Ottoman history, and, a keepsake, the first book from Amazon delivered to Mosul.

He passed the night in despair, imagining all the ways he could die, and the moment he would leave his mother and his city.

He had spent nearly his entire life in this home, with his five brothers and five sisters. He woke his mother in her bedroom on the ground floor.

“I am leaving,” he said. “Where?” she asked. “I am leaving,” was all he could say. He couldn’t endanger her by telling her anything more. In truth, since the IS had invaded his city, he’d lived a life about which she was totally unaware.

He felt her eyes on the back of his neck, and headed to the waiting Chevrolet. He didn’t look back.

For nearly two years, he’d wandered the streets of occupied Mosul, chatting with shopkeepers and Islamic State fighters, visiting friends who worked at the hospital, swapping scraps of information. He grew out his hair and his beard and wore the shortened trousers required by IS. He forced himself to witness the beheadings and deaths by stoning, so he could hear the killers call out the names of the condemned and their supposed crimes.

He wasn’t a spy. He was an undercover historian and blogger. As IS turned the Iraqi city he loved into a fundamentalist bastion, he decided he would show the world how the extremists had distorted its true nature, how they were trying to rewrite the past and forge a brutal Sunni-only future for a city that had once welcomed many faiths.

He knew that if he was caught he too would be killed.

“I am writing this for the history, because I know this will end. People will return, life will go back to normal,” is how he explained the blog that was his conduit to the citizens of Mosul and the world beyond. “After many years, there will be people who will study what happened. The city deserves to have something written to defend the city and tell the truth, because they say that when the war begins, the first victim is the truth.”

He called himself Mosul Eye. He made a promise to himself in those first few days: Trust no one, document everything.

Neither family, friends nor the Islamic State group could identify him. His readership grew by the thousands every month.

And now, he was running for his life.

But it would mean passing through one Islamic State checkpoint after another, on the odds that the extremists wouldn’t stop him, wouldn’t find the hard drive that contained evidence of IS atrocities, the names of its collaborators and fighters, and all the evidence that its bearer was the man they’d been trying to silence since they first swept in.

The weight of months and years of anonymity were crushing him.

He missed his name.

omar mohammed

From the beginning, Mosul Eye wrote simultaneously as a witness and a historian. Born in the midst of the Iran-Iraq war in 1986, he had come of age during a second war, when Saddam Hussein fell and the Americans took over. At 17, he remembers going to a meeting of extremists at the mosque and hearing them talk about fighting the crusaders. “I should be honest, I didn’t understand.”

As for the Americans, whose language he already spoke haltingly, he couldn’t fathom why they would come all the way from the United States to Mosul. He thought studying history would give him the answers.

The men in black came from the north, cutting across his neighborhood in brand new trucks, the best all-terrain Toyotas money could buy. He had seen jihadis before in Mosul and at first figured these men would fade away like the rest. But in the midst of pitched fighting, the extremists found the time to run down about 70 assassination targets and kill them all, hanging enormous banners announcing their arrival in June 2014.

By then a newly minted teacher, the historian attended a staff meeting at Mosul University, where the conquerors explained the Islamic State education system, how all classes would be based upon the strictest interpretation of the Quran. To a man who had been accused of secularism during his master’s thesis defense just the year before, it felt like the end of his career.

In those first few days, he wrote observations about IS, also known by the acronym ISIS, on his personal Facebook page — until a friend warned that he risked being killed. With the smell of battle still in the air, he wandered the streets, puzzling over its transformation into a city at war. He returned to find his family weeping. The smell of smoke and gunfire permeated the home.

On June 18, 2014, a week after the city fell, Mosul Eye was born.

“My job as a historian requires an unbiased approach which I am going to adhere to and keep my personal opinion to myself,” he wrote. “I will only communicate the facts I see.”

By day, he chatted with Islamic State fighters and vendors, and observed. Always observed. By night, he wrote in his native Arabic and fluent English on a WordPress blog and later on Facebook and Twitter.

The city turned dark, and Mosul Eye became one of the outside world’s main sources of news about the Islamic State fighters, their atrocities and their transformation of the city into a grotesque shadow of itself. The things IS wanted kept secret went to the heart of its brutal rule.

“They were organized as a killing machine. They are thirsty (for) blood and money and women.”

He attended Friday sermons with feigned enthusiasm. He collected and posted propaganda leaflets, including one on July 27, 2014, that claimed the Islamic State leader was a descendant of the Prophet Mohammed’s daughter. Back home, writing on his blog in his other, secret identity, he decried the leaflet as a blatant attempt “to distort history” to justify the fanatics’ actions.

He drank glass after glass of tea at the hospital, talking to people who worked there. Much of the information he collected went up online. Other details he kept in his computer, for fear they would give away his identity. Someday, he told himself, he would write Mosul’s history using these documents.

The most sensitive information initially came from two old friends: one a doctor and the other a high school dropout who embraced the Islamic State’s extreme interpretation of religion. He was a taxi driver who like many others in Mosul had been detained by a Shiite militia in 2008 and still burned with resentment.

He swiftly joined an intelligence unit in Mosul, becoming “one of the monsters of ISIS” — and couldn’t resist bragging about his insider knowledge.

Once he corroborated the details and masked the sources, Mosul Eye put it out for the world to see. He sometimes included photos of the fighters and commanders, complete with biographies pieced together over days of surreptitious gathering of bits and pieces of information during the course of his normal life — that of an out-of-work scholar living at home with his family.

“I used the two characters, the two personalities to serve each other,” he said. He would chat up market vendors and bored checkpoint guards for new leads.

isis iraqHe took on other identities as well on Facebook. Although the names were clearly fake, the characters started to take on a life of their own. One was named Mouris Milton whom he came to believe was an even better version of himself — funny, knowledgeable. Another was Ibn al-Athir al-Mawsilli, a coldly logical historian.

International media picked up on Mosul Eye from the first days, starting with an online question-and-answer with a German newspaper. The anonymous writer gave periodic written interviews in English over the years. Sometimes, journalists quoted his blog and called it an interview. In October 2016, he spoke by phone with the New Yorker for a profile but still kept his identity masked.

Intelligence agencies made contact as well and he rebuffed them each time.

“I am not a spy or a journalist,” he would say. “I tell them this: If you want the information, it’s published and it’s public for free. Take it.”

First the Islamic State group compiled lists of women accused of prostitution, he said, stoning or shooting around 500 in the initial months. Then it went after men accused of being gay, flinging them off tall buildings. Shiites, Christians and Yazidis fled from a city once proud of its multiple religions.

When the only Mosul residents left were fellow Sunnis, they too were not spared, according to the catalog of horrors that is Mosul Eye’s daily report. He detailed the deaths and whippings, for spying and apostasy, for failing to attend prayers, for overdue taxes. The blog attracted the attention of the fanatics, who posted death threats in the comments section.

Less than a year into their rule, in March 2015, he nearly cracked. IS beheaded a 14-year-old in front of a crowd; 12 people were arrested for selling and smoking cigarettes, and some of them flogged publicly. Seeing few alternatives, young men from Mosul were joining up by the dozens.

The sight of a fanatic severing the hand of a child accused of stealing unmoored him. The man told the boy that his hand was a gift of repentance to God before serenely slicing it away.

It was too much.

Mosul Eye was done. He defied the dress requirements, cut his hair short, shaved his beard and pulled on a bright red crewneck sweater. He persuaded his closest friend to join him.

“I decided to die.”

The sun shining, they drove to the banks of the Tigris blasting forbidden music from the car. They spread a scrap of rug over a stone outcropping and shared a carafe of tea. Mosul Eye lit a cigarette, heedless of a handful of other people picnicking nearby.

“I was so tired of worrying about myself, my family, my brothers. I am not alive to worry, but I am alive to live this life. I thought: I am done.”

He planned it as a sort of last supper, a final joyful day to end all days. He assumed he would be spotted, arrested, tortured. The tea was the best he had ever tasted.

Somehow, incredibly, his crimes went unnoticed.

He went home.

“At that moment I felt like I was given a new life.”

He grew out his hair and beard again, put the shortened trousers back on. And, for the remainder of his time in Mosul, smoked and listened to music in his room with the curtains drawn and the lights off. His computer screen and the tip of his cigarette glowed as he wrote in the dark.

The next month, he slipped up.

His friend the ex-taxi driver told him about an airstrike that had just killed multiple high-level Islamic State commanders, destroying a giant weapons cache. Elated, Mosul Eye dashed home to post it online. He hit “publish” and then, minutes later, realized his mistake. The information could have come from only one person. He trashed the post and spent a sleepless night.

“It’s like a death game and one mistake could finish your life.”

For a week, he went dark. Then he invited his friend to meet at a restaurant. They ate spicy chicken, an unemployed teacher and the gun-toting ex-taxi driver talking again about their city and their lives. His cover was not blown.

The historian went back online. Alongside the blog, he kept meticulous records — information too dangerous to share.

His computer hard drive filled with death, filed according to date, cause of death, perpetrator, neighborhood and ethnicity. Accompanying each spreadsheet entry was a separate file with observations from each day.

“IS is forcing abortions and tubal ligation surgeries on Yazidi women,” he wrote in unpublished notes from January 2015. A doctor told him there had been between 50 and 60 forced abortions and a dozen Yazidi girls younger than 15 died of injuries from repeated rapes.

April 19, 2015: “The forensics department received the bodies of 23 IS militants killed in Baiji. They had no shrapnel, no bullets, no explosives and the cause of death does not seem to be explosion. It is like nothing happened to the bodies. A medical source believes they were exposed to poison gas.”

July 7, 2015: “43 citizens were executed in different places, this time by gunfire, which is unusual because they were previously beheadings. A source inside IS said that 13 of those who were executed are fighters and they tried to flee.”

He noted a flurry of security on days when the Islamic State leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, seemed to be in town.

omar mohammedMany in Iraq, especially those who supported the Shiite-dominated leadership in Baghdad, blamed Mosul for its own fate. Mosul Eye freely acknowledged that some residents at first believed the new conquerors could only be an improvement over the heavy-handed government and the soldiers who fled with hardly a backward glance at the city they were supposed to defend.

But he also wrote publicly and privately of the suffering among citizens who refused to join the group. He was fighting on two fronts: “One against ISIS, and the other against the rumors. Trying to protect the face of Mosul, the soul of Mosul.”

He tested out different voices, implying one day that he was Christian, another that he was Muslim. Sometimes he indicated he was gone, other times that he was still in the city. “I couldn’t trust anyone,” he said.

In his mind, he left Mosul a thousand times, but always found reasons to stay: his mother, his nieces and nephews, his mission.

But finally, he had to go.

“I had to run away with the proof that will protect Mosul for years to come, and to at least be loyal to the people who were killed in the city.”

And he did not want to become another casualty of the monsters.

“I think I deserve life, deserve to be alive.”

A smuggler, persuaded by $1,000 and the assurances of a mutual acquaintance, agreed to get him out. He was leaving the next day. Mosul Eye had no time to reflect, no time to change his mind.

He returned home and began transferring the contents of his computer to the hard drive. He pulled out the orange notebook with the hand-drawn map of Mosul on the cover and the outlines of what he hoped would one day be his doctoral dissertation. Into the bag went “Father Bombo’s Pilgrimage to Mecca,” an obscure American satirical novel from 1770 that he had ordered from Amazon via a new shop that was the only place in town to order from abroad online.

It was time to leave.

He wanted to make sure his mother would never have to watch the capture and killing of Mosul Eye.

On Dec. 15, 2015 he left Mosul, driving with the smuggler to the outskirts of Raqqa, a pickup point that alarmed him. From there he and other Iraqis and Syrians were picked up by a second set of smugglers and driven by convoy to Turkey.

They had no trouble crossing the border.

In Turkey, Mosul Eye kept at it: via WhatsApp and Viber, from Facebook messages and long conversations with friends and relatives who had contacts within IS. From hundreds of kilometers away, his life remained consumed by events in Mosul.

By mid-2016, deaths were piling up faster than he could document. The IS and airstrikes were taking a bloody toll on residents. His records grew haphazard, and he turned to Twitter to document the atrocities. In February 2017, he received asylum in Europe with the aid of an organization that learned his backstory. He continued to track the airstrikes and Islamic State killings

He mapped the airstrikes as they closed in on his family, pleading with his older brother to leave his home in West Mosul. Ahmed, 36, died days later when shrapnel from a mortar strike pierced his heart, leaving behind four young children.

It was only then that Mosul Eye revealed his secret to a younger brother — who was proud to learn the anonymous historian he had been reading for so long was his brother.

“People in Mosul had lost hope and confidence in politicians, in everything,” his brother said. Mosul Eye “managed to show that it’s possible to change the situation in the city and bring it back to life.”

As the Old City crumbled, Mosul Eye sent coordinates and phone numbers for homes filled with civilians to a BBC journalist who was covering the battle, trying to get the attention of someone in the coalition command. He believes he saved lives.

Then, with his beloved Old City destroyed, Mosul Eye launched a fundraiser to rebuild the city’s libraries because the extremists had burned all the books. None of his volunteers knew his identity.

An activist who helped co-found a “Women of Mosul” Facebook group with Mosul Eye describes him as a “spiritual leader” for the city’s secular-minded.

“He was telling us about the day-to-day events under ISIS and we were following closely with excitement as if we were watching a movie. Sometimes he went through hard times and we used to encourage him. He won the people’s trust and we became very curious to know his real personality,” said the activist, who spoke on condition of anonymity because she believed she was still in danger.

From a distance, finally writing his dissertation on 19th century Mosul history in the safety of a European city, he continued to write as Mosul Eye and organize cultural events and fundraisers from afar — even after Mosul was liberated.

The double life consumed him, sapped energy he’d rather use for the doctoral dissertation and for helping Mosul rebuild. And it hurt when someone asked the young Iraqi why he didn’t do more to help his people. He desperately wanted his mother to know all that he had done.

He felt barely real, with so many people knowing him by false identities: 293,000 followers on Facebook, 37,000 on WordPress and 23,400 on Twitter.

In hours of face-to-face conversations with The Associated Press over the course of two months, he agonized over when and how to end the anonymity that plagued him. He did not want to be a virtual character anymore.

On Nov. 15, 2017, Mosul Eye made his decision.

“I can’t be anonymous anymore. This is to say that I defeated ISIS. You can see me now, and you can know me now.”

He is 31 years old.

His name is Omar Mohammed.

“I am a scholar.”

SEE ALSO: This map shows the last Islamic State stronghold in Syria

DON'T MISS: Iran's president has declared the end of the Islamic State

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What happens to your brain and body if you use Adderall recreationally

Putin officially calls on Russia's military to pull out of Syria during surprise visit to base

$
0
0

su 24 frogfoot syria

  • Russia has been helping Syria's government fight its civil war since 2015, and Russian President Vladimir Putin just called his military out.
  • Russia has been linked to a brutal air campaign that killed many civilians during the campaign.
  • Putin maintains that Russia mainly fought against ISIS and terrorists in Syria.

MOSCOW (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin on Monday ordered Russian forces in Syria to start withdrawing, saying that after a two year military campaign, Moscow and Damascus had achieved their mission of destroying Islamic State.

Putin made the announcement during a surprise visit to Russia's Hmeymim air base in Syria's Latakia Province where he held talks with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and addressed Russian military servicemen.

Russia first launched air strikes in Syria in September 2015 in its biggest Middle East intervention in decades, turning the tide of the conflict in Assad's favor while dramatically increasing Moscow's own influence in the Middle East.

Putin on Monday gave the order for Russian forces to start withdrawing to their permanent bases in Russia, the Kremlin said on its website.

"The task of fighting armed bandits here in Syria, a task that it was essential to solve with the help of extensive use of armed force, has for the most part, been solved and solved spectacularly," Putin said, in remarks broadcast on Russian television.

"I congratulate you!," Putin told Russian servicemen gathered at the base.

He was also quoted as saying that Russia would keep the Hmeymim air base as well as a naval facility at the Syrian port of Tartous.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The world's largest pyramid is not in Egypt

This teenage Syrian refugee has an inspiring message about proving the 'haters' wrong and building a new life in the UK

$
0
0
  • Business Insider spoke with 18-year-old Syrian refugee Maya Ghazal. 
  • She said the UK's multicultural society made her feel supported despite her limited understanding of English.
  • She now engages in voluntary work and is determined to prove critics of refugees wrong.

 

Diana Legacy Award winner Maya Ghazal arrived in the UK as a 15-year-old in 2015. She told Business Insider that despite her initial struggles and feelings of loneliness in her new home, she integrated well and is now a keen voluntary worker.

The following is a transcript of the video.

Maya Ghazal: My name is Maya Ghazal. I’m 18 years old and I’m from Damascus, Syria. I left Damascus when I was 15 years old, in 2015. When I first arrived in the UK, I arrived in Birmingham, and I stayed there for two years. There, I went to college, and I found that city was very diverse. It had many different nationalities from all around the world, speaking different languages and having different cultures. I wasn’t the only one who was new in the country, I wasn’t the only one that was struggling with English, and that really helped.

I met my friend, and she’s Lithuanian, and she is also like – we started improving our English together and we helped each other with Maths and we carried on with our engineering course, and up until this point, we still support each other.

In terms of people living in the UK, I’ve never faced someone who isn’t welcoming towards refugees.I was lucky enough that everyone who I faced and talked to – everyone was understanding. They knew our reasons of why we needed to leave. It wasn’t something that we chose to do, It wasn’t something that we wanted really, just to leave our country, everything we’ve built, our own language, and just to start from zero. Not many people want that. Not many people are capable of doing that. We’re really trying hard, and we don’t want to stay at home and not work and be lonely and unemployed.

I totally understand the haters, it’s just that maybe they don’t see the bigger picture – or maybe they do. Maybe they just don’t see our picture or from our angle or point of view. I’ve seen some not very nice comments around, either talking about my religion, or being racist or so, but I just don’t put myself down for them. These comments give me a push forward that I need to prove them wrong and I need to prove to them I’m someone that’s worthy – I could be as good as the person who wrote that comment could be.

For me, I really want to be an example, I do voluntary work and I really want to give something back to the community that welcomed me, to the place that put me into education, into university. Some people have really achieved a lot, and I really want to be considered as one of them later on.

More than 65 million people around the world have been forced to leave their homes to escape war, famine and climate change. To learn more about the plight of refugees across the world, Ai Weiwei’s film Human Flow is in UK cinemas now.

Produced by Fraser Moore. Camera by David Ibekwe. Special thanks to Kieran Corcoran.

Join the conversation about this story »

Air Force says Russia made up an incident over Syria between an F-22 and an Su-35 in response to a critical NYT story

$
0
0

f-22

  • Russian Defense Ministry accused the US on Saturday of interfering with Russian bombing runs on ISIS positions in Syria, citing an example between an F-22 and an Su-35.
  • The US Air Force denies the allegations, and said they were only in response to US accusations of Russian fighters flying unsafely.
  • Russia did not provide additional examples of US fighters flying unsafely, and the US flight and call logs show no record of the F-22 and Su-35 incident ever happening.


The Russian Defense Ministry accused the US on Saturday of interfering with Russian bombing runs on ISIS positions in Syria.

Russia described an alleged November 23 incident during which an F-22 Raptor maneuvered dangerously near two Su-25s before an Su-35 chased it away.

But the US Air Force denies the incident ever happened and says it likely came in response to a critical article in The New York Times.

"It's interesting the Russians didn't raise these unfounded allegations until a New York Times article publicly exposed a serious matter the Coalition has tried diligently to address daily via the deconfliction line," an Air Force official told Business Insider in an email on Tuesday.

"Had an F-22 actually flown across the river into their deconflicted airspace, the Russians would have raised this on the call and it would have been discussed. Coalition deconfliction call transcripts show no such incident ever transpired," the official said.

The Air Force accused Russian fighter jets of flying dangerously close to US jets multiple times over Syria in November in a Times article published last Friday. In one instance, the Air Force said two A-10 Warthogs almost collided head-on with an Su-24 flying in Coalition airspace.

Last month, the US and Russia agreed to stay on opposite sides of a 45-mile stretch along the Euphrates River to avoid accidents in the skies as they both conduct bombing runs on remaining ISIS fighters.

Russia Russian Sukhoi SU 35 Fighter Jet

The US and Russia are also supposed to call the other side on a "deconfliction line"— which was set up two years ago to further avoid collisions — to let them know if they ever need to cross over.

“We've had contentious calls,” Col. Jeff Hogan told the Times, describing conversations with Russian officials on the deconfliction line.

"We saw anywhere from six to eight incidents daily in late November, where Russian or Syrian aircraft crossed into our airspace on the east side of the Euphrates River," Lt. Col. Damien Pickart told CNN on Saturday.

"It's become increasingly tough for our pilots to discern whether Russian pilots are deliberately testing or baiting us into reacting, or if these are just honest mistakes,” Pickart also told the Times.

Russia responds

In response to these US Air Force allegations, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major-General Igor Konashenkov told Russian media on Saturday that "most close-midair encounters between Russian and US jets in the area around the Euphrates River have been linked to the attempts of US aircraft to get in the way [of the Russian warplanes] striking against Islamic State terrorists."

Konashenkov also accused the US of operating in Syria illegally, as the UN Security Council has never passed a resolution allowing the US to use force in Syria.

To back up his claim about US fighters flying unsafely, Konashenkov alleged that an F-22 Raptor crossed into Russian airspace on November 23 to disrupt two Su-25 bombing runs, before it was chased away by an Su-35.

Su-25

"The F-22 launched decoy flares and used airbrakes while constantly maneuvering [near the Russian strike jets], imitating an air fight" before it was chased away, Konashenkov said.

But the US Air Force categorically denies the incident, saying in a statement that deconfliction phone line transcripts show Russia never called about the incident and that Coalition flight logs have no record of any US cross overs without informing Russia first.

Russia, on the other hand, appears to have only brought up the alleged November 23 incident after the Times and CNN articles were published and didn't provide other examples of US fighters flying unsafely or disrupting Russian bombing runs.

The Russian Embassy in Washington DC and the Russian Defense Ministry did not respond to multiple calls and emails from Business Insider asking for more examples of US fighters flying unsafely and why Moscow never mentioned the alleged November 23 incident until after the Times and CNN articles were published.

SEE ALSO: We asked an F-22 Raptor fighter-wing commander if he's worried about Russia's Su-57 stealth fighter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Everything we know about the mysterious SR-72 — Lockheed Martin's successor to the fastest plane ever

UN makes rare call to Putin to show 'courage' and push Syria's government to new elections

$
0
0

putin and assad

  • The UN Syria envoy called on Russian President Vladimir Puting to 'have the courage' to push Syria's government towards new elections and a new constitution.
  • The statement was an unusual appeal to Russia, which has become a key player in the Middle East.
  • Russia has provided Syria with lifelines to keep its regime in power throughout its more than 6 year civil war.

GENEVA (AP) — The U.N. Syria envoy has called on Russian President Vladimir Putin to "have the courage" to push the Syrian government to accept new elections and a new constitution.

In an unusual public appeal directly to a key powerbroker in the region, Staffan de Mistura told a TV interviewer the Russian leader should "convince the (Syrian) government that there is no time to lose" in efforts to reach peace in Syria after more than 6-1/2 years of war.

Russia has provided crucial military and diplomatic backing to Syrian President Bashar Assad's forces, though Putin announced a drawdown of Russian military forces in Syria this week. He made the announcement during a visit to a Russian military base in Syria in the wake of successes against extremist militants.

Asked on Swiss broadcaster RTS what signal Putin could provide now, de Mistura alluded to how territorial gains would be "temporary. But the peace must be won — and for the peace to be won, it's necessary to have the courage to push the government also to accept that there must be a new constitution and new elections."

Russia bombing syria iran russia

The comments late Wednesday to Swiss broadcaster RTS came near the end of the eighth round of intra-Syrian peace talks under his mediation since early 2016, which is set to end Friday at the latest. A new session was set to take place on Thursday morning, and de Mistura was signaling frustration at the lack of progress in the round.

De Mistura said it was "regrettable" that Assad's delegation had refused to meet face-to-face with the opposition in what have been indirect talks in Geneva.

He re-emphasized the importance of a U.N. role in any peace process, and held up a color-coded map showing the divisions of territorial control in the war-battered country. Syria's war is estimated to have killed at least 400,000 people and driven more than 12 million people from their homes.

SEE ALSO: US to present 'irrefutable evidence' that Iran violated the nuclear deal

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How much money you need to save each day to become a millionaire by age 65

Viewing all 4970 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images